<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, directing the company to deposit Rs. 3 crores towards duty by a specified date, with a waiver of the remaining duty and penalty if complied with. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. The decision balanced classification issues, time limitations, and hardship claims, providing a specific directive for the company regarding the deposit and waiver of duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue, directing the company to deposit Rs. 3 crores towards duty by a specified date, with a waiver of the remaining duty and penalty if complied with. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. The decision balanced classification issues, time limitations, and hardship claims, providing a specific directive for the company regarding the deposit and waiver of duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>