https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109557 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, directing the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of equipment/machinery as per the Hire Purchase Agreements. The court determined the agreements were hire purchase, not lease agreements, requiring a stamp fee of Rs. 20. The court held the Civil Court decree was additional support, not the basis of the claim, and dismissed jurisdictional concerns. Ultimately, the applicant prevailed in the repossession and recovery of costs, with the court finding no merit in the opponent's arguments. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:38:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109557 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, directing the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of equipment/machinery as per the Hire Purchase Agreements. The court determined the agreements were hire purchase, not lease agreements, requiring a stamp fee of Rs. 20. The court held the Civil Court decree was additional support, not the basis of the claim, and dismissed jurisdictional concerns. Ultimately, the applicant prevailed in the repossession and recovery of costs, with the court finding no merit in the opponent's arguments. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109557