<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 388 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109556</link>
    <description>Where wrong availment of credit is detected and the duty is paid before the show cause notice is issued, a lenient view on penalty may be justified. The material consideration was that the duty demand had already been discharged on being pointed out by the Revenue, so the penalty was found liable to be moderated to meet the ends of justice. The penalty was accordingly reduced to Rs. 50,000, while the appeal was otherwise dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:39:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 388 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109556</link>
      <description>Where wrong availment of credit is detected and the duty is paid before the show cause notice is issued, a lenient view on penalty may be justified. The material consideration was that the duty demand had already been discharged on being pointed out by the Revenue, so the penalty was found liable to be moderated to meet the ends of justice. The penalty was accordingly reduced to Rs. 50,000, while the appeal was otherwise dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>