https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109524 Where a company had already been declared sick by BIFR and a reference for winding up was pending before the High Court under section 20(2) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, a parallel petition under sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 was found unnecessary. The creditor's claim was to be pursued in the pending winding up proceedings by lodging proof before the Official Liquidator, and the interim orders in the connected matter were to continue to operate. The separate winding up petition was therefore not entertained and was disposed of. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:19:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109524 Where a company had already been declared sick by BIFR and a reference for winding up was pending before the High Court under section 20(2) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, a parallel petition under sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 was found unnecessary. The creditor's claim was to be pursued in the pending winding up proceedings by lodging proof before the Official Liquidator, and the interim orders in the connected matter were to continue to operate. The separate winding up petition was therefore not entertained and was disposed of. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109524