<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109520</link>
    <description>The petition for winding up the respondent-company due to unpaid debts and interest was dismissed by the court. The respondent voluntarily paid the outstanding amount claimed by the petitioner during the proceedings, leading the court to reject the insolvency claim and support the respondent&#039;s commercial solvency assertion. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue the interest claim separately outside the company court despite dismissing the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:03:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109520</link>
      <description>The petition for winding up the respondent-company due to unpaid debts and interest was dismissed by the court. The respondent voluntarily paid the outstanding amount claimed by the petitioner during the proceedings, leading the court to reject the insolvency claim and support the respondent&#039;s commercial solvency assertion. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue the interest claim separately outside the company court despite dismissing the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>