<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 335 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109515</link>
    <description>An order admitting a winding up petition and directing advertisement is appealable, but it operates only as a prima facie finding that the petition deserves further inquiry and does not finally determine the parties&#039; rights. A brief order is not defective merely because it is non-detailed if it shows threshold consideration of the petition. Appellate interference is warranted only in a gross case where the petition is clearly not maintainable. On the material described, the issuance and dishonour of cheques supported the debt claim, while the alleged defence did not establish a bona fide dispute sufficient to defeat admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 335 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109515</link>
      <description>An order admitting a winding up petition and directing advertisement is appealable, but it operates only as a prima facie finding that the petition deserves further inquiry and does not finally determine the parties&#039; rights. A brief order is not defective merely because it is non-detailed if it shows threshold consideration of the petition. Appellate interference is warranted only in a gross case where the petition is clearly not maintainable. On the material described, the issuance and dishonour of cheques supported the debt claim, while the alleged defence did not establish a bona fide dispute sufficient to defeat admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>