<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109513</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner company&#039;s scheme did not meet the criteria of a &#039;Collective Investment Scheme&#039; under section 11AA of the SEBI Act, 1992. As a result, the SEBI Regulations, 1999 were deemed inapplicable to the company. The court quashed the SEBI notices issued to the company and allowed both writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109513</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner company&#039;s scheme did not meet the criteria of a &#039;Collective Investment Scheme&#039; under section 11AA of the SEBI Act, 1992. As a result, the SEBI Regulations, 1999 were deemed inapplicable to the company. The court quashed the SEBI notices issued to the company and allowed both writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>