<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 357 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109507</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a winding-up petition as the respondent company&#039;s registered office was in Kolkata, as per the Companies Act, 1956. Despite the petitioners&#039; argument that the cause of action arose in Jaipur, where work was performed, the Court determined that jurisdiction is primarily based on the location of the company&#039;s registered office unless specified otherwise. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the company petition due to the lack of jurisdiction in Jaipur and upheld that the petition was not maintainable in their jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 357 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109507</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a winding-up petition as the respondent company&#039;s registered office was in Kolkata, as per the Companies Act, 1956. Despite the petitioners&#039; argument that the cause of action arose in Jaipur, where work was performed, the Court determined that jurisdiction is primarily based on the location of the company&#039;s registered office unless specified otherwise. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the company petition due to the lack of jurisdiction in Jaipur and upheld that the petition was not maintainable in their jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>