<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109504</link>
    <description>A statutory Industry Facilitation Council performing arbitral and quasi-judicial functions is amenable to the High Court&#039;s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. Its power to entertain references, decide jurisdictional objections, conduct proceedings, and make awards brings it within the scope of supervisory review. When dealing with threshold objections on limitation and jurisdiction, the Council must record reasons; a cryptic or non-speaking order rejecting such objections cannot be sustained. In supervisory jurisdiction, such an order is liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109504</link>
      <description>A statutory Industry Facilitation Council performing arbitral and quasi-judicial functions is amenable to the High Court&#039;s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. Its power to entertain references, decide jurisdictional objections, conduct proceedings, and make awards brings it within the scope of supervisory review. When dealing with threshold objections on limitation and jurisdiction, the Council must record reasons; a cryptic or non-speaking order rejecting such objections cannot be sustained. In supervisory jurisdiction, such an order is liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>