https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109498 Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars coercive enforcement against a sick industrial company during BIFR proceedings, but it does not prohibit adjudication of an industrial dispute or automatically invalidate an award directing reinstatement. The Calcutta High Court treated back wages as a monetary component, yet held that the award for reinstatement and payment of 50 per cent back wages was not unenforceable merely because sickness proceedings were pending. The challenge to the award and its publication therefore failed, and the labour award was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:01:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109498 Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars coercive enforcement against a sick industrial company during BIFR proceedings, but it does not prohibit adjudication of an industrial dispute or automatically invalidate an award directing reinstatement. The Calcutta High Court treated back wages as a monetary component, yet held that the award for reinstatement and payment of 50 per cent back wages was not unenforceable merely because sickness proceedings were pending. The challenge to the award and its publication therefore failed, and the labour award was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109498