https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109467 Where a statute provides a complete appellate hierarchy, writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 will ordinarily not be exercised if an effective statutory remedy exists, absent breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or infringement of fundamental rights. The Delhi HC held that the petition was not maintainable because the Act provided appeals from the Recovery Officer to the Tribunal and then to the Appellate Tribunal. Reading sections 30 and 20 together, the Court treated the amended scheme as creating a two-tier appellate structure and gave effect to the plain statutory language. The dispute was therefore left to be pursued through the statutory appeal process. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:22:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109467 Where a statute provides a complete appellate hierarchy, writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 will ordinarily not be exercised if an effective statutory remedy exists, absent breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or infringement of fundamental rights. The Delhi HC held that the petition was not maintainable because the Act provided appeals from the Recovery Officer to the Tribunal and then to the Appellate Tribunal. Reading sections 30 and 20 together, the Court treated the amended scheme as creating a two-tier appellate structure and gave effect to the plain statutory language. The dispute was therefore left to be pursued through the statutory appeal process. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109467