<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 583 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, holding that they were entitled to the rebate claim originally sanctioned and paid, without being subject to the provisions of unjust enrichment. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal issues involved, focusing on the specific provisions of the Notification and the retrospective effect of the law on unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 583 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, holding that they were entitled to the rebate claim originally sanctioned and paid, without being subject to the provisions of unjust enrichment. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal issues involved, focusing on the specific provisions of the Notification and the retrospective effect of the law on unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>