<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109449</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the annulment of trades by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) during settlement No. 27 for shares of Maruti Organics Limited. It upheld the NSE&#039;s authority to annul trades in cases of fraud or market manipulation, citing statutory power under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. The court directed compensation for genuine buyers not involved in fraud and disciplinary action against errant stock brokers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109449</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the annulment of trades by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) during settlement No. 27 for shares of Maruti Organics Limited. It upheld the NSE&#039;s authority to annul trades in cases of fraud or market manipulation, citing statutory power under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. The court directed compensation for genuine buyers not involved in fraud and disciplinary action against errant stock brokers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>