<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 580 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109443</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating the Indian currency and directing its release to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, ownership verification, and the legality of confessional statements in cases involving the confiscation of seized goods and currency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 580 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109443</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating the Indian currency and directing its release to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, ownership verification, and the legality of confessional statements in cases involving the confiscation of seized goods and currency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>