<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 390 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109431</link>
    <description>The court held that SEBI Appeal Nos. 10 of 2002 and 1 of 2003 are not maintainable in the High Court and should be presented to the Supreme Court. However, SEBI Appeal Nos. 1 and 9 of 2002, filed before the amendment, remain maintainable in the High Court. The judgment clarified the prospective application of the amended section 15Z, the procedural nature of the change in the appellate forum, and the survival of pending appeals under the old section 15Z.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 390 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109431</link>
      <description>The court held that SEBI Appeal Nos. 10 of 2002 and 1 of 2003 are not maintainable in the High Court and should be presented to the Supreme Court. However, SEBI Appeal Nos. 1 and 9 of 2002, filed before the amendment, remain maintainable in the High Court. The judgment clarified the prospective application of the amended section 15Z, the procedural nature of the change in the appellate forum, and the survival of pending appeals under the old section 15Z.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>