https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109404 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a self-contained code for arbitral procedure and jurisdictional objections, so writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not maintainable where the statute provides an effective inbuilt remedy. Procedural timelines under sections 18, 19, 23, 25 and 32 must be read harmoniously with the tribunal's duty to ensure equal treatment and a full opportunity to present the case. On that basis, section 25(a) was construed in context as not requiring automatic termination for delay in filing the statement of claim, and the arbitral tribunal was treated as competent to grant a reasonable extension of time. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:50:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109404 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a self-contained code for arbitral procedure and jurisdictional objections, so writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not maintainable where the statute provides an effective inbuilt remedy. Procedural timelines under sections 18, 19, 23, 25 and 32 must be read harmoniously with the tribunal's duty to ensure equal treatment and a full opportunity to present the case. On that basis, section 25(a) was construed in context as not requiring automatic termination for delay in filing the statement of claim, and the arbitral tribunal was treated as competent to grant a reasonable extension of time. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109404