https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109398 A reference to arbitration under NSE bye-laws was treated as within limitation because the six-month period ran from the date liability was expressly denied, and the special bye-law limitation prevailed over the general Limitation Act. The arbitral tribunal was held to have jurisdiction because the dealing agreement incorporated the NSE rules and bye-laws, and its refusal to summon documents under section 27 was a permissible evidentiary decision where relevance was not shown. The award was nonetheless found contrary to the contractual and regulatory framework governing close-out transactions, so it was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh determination of any amount payable under the close-out provisions. en-us Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:45:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109398 A reference to arbitration under NSE bye-laws was treated as within limitation because the six-month period ran from the date liability was expressly denied, and the special bye-law limitation prevailed over the general Limitation Act. The arbitral tribunal was held to have jurisdiction because the dealing agreement incorporated the NSE rules and bye-laws, and its refusal to summon documents under section 27 was a permissible evidentiary decision where relevance was not shown. The award was nonetheless found contrary to the contractual and regulatory framework governing close-out transactions, so it was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh determination of any amount payable under the close-out provisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109398