https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109379 The State and National Commissions interpreted the term "impact" liberally in an insurance policy dispute. The Courts upheld the decision, ruling that damage caused by a bulldozer's close drive was covered under the policy. The judgments emphasized interpreting terms in favor of the insured in cases of ambiguity, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109379 The State and National Commissions interpreted the term "impact" liberally in an insurance policy dispute. The Courts upheld the decision, ruling that damage caused by a bulldozer's close drive was covered under the policy. The judgments emphasized interpreting terms in favor of the insured in cases of ambiguity, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109379