<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109378</link>
    <description>Section 22(1) of SICA bars continuation of pending proceedings, including appeals, where the proceeding concerns a monetary claim against a sick industrial company, unless consent is obtained from the Board or Appellate Authority. The operative phrase &quot;be proceeded with further&quot; is read broadly to cover continuation at any stage, and the bar is not limited to proceedings originally instituted against the company. A sick company&#039;s own appeal does not escape the restriction if the underlying dispute is a money claim. The provision is applied in light of SICA&#039;s protective and rehabilitative scheme, avoiding inconsistent treatment of appeals and cross-objections arising from the same transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109378</link>
      <description>Section 22(1) of SICA bars continuation of pending proceedings, including appeals, where the proceeding concerns a monetary claim against a sick industrial company, unless consent is obtained from the Board or Appellate Authority. The operative phrase &quot;be proceeded with further&quot; is read broadly to cover continuation at any stage, and the bar is not limited to proceedings originally instituted against the company. A sick company&#039;s own appeal does not escape the restriction if the underlying dispute is a money claim. The provision is applied in light of SICA&#039;s protective and rehabilitative scheme, avoiding inconsistent treatment of appeals and cross-objections arising from the same transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>