<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 372 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109375</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement and approved the reduction of share capital sought by the Transferor and Transferee Companies. Objections raised by the Central Government were countered successfully, with shareholder and creditor approval noted. The Court&#039;s role was supervisory, ensuring fairness and legality. Emphasizing the shareholders&#039; decision-making authority, the Court found the scheme fair and not prejudicial, concluding it did not contravene public policy or statutory provisions. As a result, the Company Petitions were allowed, the Scheme of Arrangement was sanctioned, and the share capital reduction was approved, with the Transferor Company to be dissolved and amalgamated with the Transferee Company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 372 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109375</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement and approved the reduction of share capital sought by the Transferor and Transferee Companies. Objections raised by the Central Government were countered successfully, with shareholder and creditor approval noted. The Court&#039;s role was supervisory, ensuring fairness and legality. Emphasizing the shareholders&#039; decision-making authority, the Court found the scheme fair and not prejudicial, concluding it did not contravene public policy or statutory provisions. As a result, the Company Petitions were allowed, the Scheme of Arrangement was sanctioned, and the share capital reduction was approved, with the Transferor Company to be dissolved and amalgamated with the Transferee Company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>