<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 367 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109370</link>
    <description>The appellate court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge and the Company Law Board&#039;s order in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act. The court remanded the case to the Company Law Board for fresh disposal within six months due to procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, emphasizing the need for a thorough retrial based on proper evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 367 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109370</link>
      <description>The appellate court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge and the Company Law Board&#039;s order in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act. The court remanded the case to the Company Law Board for fresh disposal within six months due to procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, emphasizing the need for a thorough retrial based on proper evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>