<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 383 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109334</link>
    <description>Remission of a sentence for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act falls within the Central Government&#039;s competence under section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appropriate-government test depends on whether the offence concerns a matter within the Union&#039;s executive power. Parliament has exclusive legislative authority over cheques under the constitutional distribution of legislative powers; accordingly, an offence arising from cheque dishonour relates to a Union matter. The State Government is therefore not competent to consider remission for such a conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 383 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109334</link>
      <description>Remission of a sentence for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act falls within the Central Government&#039;s competence under section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appropriate-government test depends on whether the offence concerns a matter within the Union&#039;s executive power. Parliament has exclusive legislative authority over cheques under the constitutional distribution of legislative powers; accordingly, an offence arising from cheque dishonour relates to a Union matter. The State Government is therefore not competent to consider remission for such a conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>