<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 382 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109333</link>
    <description>Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 imposes a duty on the Board of Directors to make a reference within sixty days of finalisation of audited accounts, but that period is not a limitation bar that extinguishes a delayed reference. The provision is part of a rehabilitation framework aimed at early detection of sickness and remedial intervention, and it must be read with the Act&#039;s broader scheme allowing references under section 16 and penal consequences for non-compliance under section 33. A delayed reference therefore cannot be rejected solely for being filed after sixty days, because that construction would undermine the Act&#039;s rehabilitative object.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:51:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 382 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109333</link>
      <description>Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 imposes a duty on the Board of Directors to make a reference within sixty days of finalisation of audited accounts, but that period is not a limitation bar that extinguishes a delayed reference. The provision is part of a rehabilitation framework aimed at early detection of sickness and remedial intervention, and it must be read with the Act&#039;s broader scheme allowing references under section 16 and penal consequences for non-compliance under section 33. A delayed reference therefore cannot be rejected solely for being filed after sixty days, because that construction would undermine the Act&#039;s rehabilitative object.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>