https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109330 A writ petition under Article 226 was held ordinarily not maintainable against a notice under the SARFAESI Act's Section 13(2), because the notice is only a pre-measure step inviting the borrower to discharge liability and does not itself trigger the statutory right of appeal. The Court noted that the borrower can raise limited objections to the notice, and any measure taken under Section 13(4) may be challenged before the Debts Recovery Tribunal with further recourse under Section 18. While Article 226 remains available, interference at this stage is generally unwarranted except for want of jurisdiction, arbitrariness, mala fides, or gross miscarriage of justice. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:46:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109330 A writ petition under Article 226 was held ordinarily not maintainable against a notice under the SARFAESI Act's Section 13(2), because the notice is only a pre-measure step inviting the borrower to discharge liability and does not itself trigger the statutory right of appeal. The Court noted that the borrower can raise limited objections to the notice, and any measure taken under Section 13(4) may be challenged before the Debts Recovery Tribunal with further recourse under Section 18. While Article 226 remains available, interference at this stage is generally unwarranted except for want of jurisdiction, arbitrariness, mala fides, or gross miscarriage of justice. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109330