<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 378 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109329</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be invoked against a show-cause notice, because jurisdictional and factual objections can be raised before the issuing authority unless the notice is plainly without jurisdiction. Interim protection must not have the effect of granting final relief or freezing statutory proceedings without recorded reasons. The SC therefore permitted the statutory proceedings to continue and left the writ petition to be decided on merits, while preserving a limited restraint that the final order pursuant to the notice would not be communicated without leave or further orders of the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 378 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109329</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be invoked against a show-cause notice, because jurisdictional and factual objections can be raised before the issuing authority unless the notice is plainly without jurisdiction. Interim protection must not have the effect of granting final relief or freezing statutory proceedings without recorded reasons. The SC therefore permitted the statutory proceedings to continue and left the writ petition to be decided on merits, while preserving a limited restraint that the final order pursuant to the notice would not be communicated without leave or further orders of the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>