https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109324 The Court held that a joint application by multiple companies under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act is maintainable, provided each company is separately numbered, pays separate court fees, and publishes separate notices. The judgment clarified that separate applications are not required for each company, emphasizing the need for reports from the Central Government and Registrar for each company involved. The Court highlighted the applicability of Order I Rule 1 of the CPC to company petitions, allowing multiple plaintiffs to join in one suit. Additionally, the Court discussed the concept of per incuriam in judicial decisions and the precedential value of coordinate Bench decisions. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:32:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109324 The Court held that a joint application by multiple companies under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act is maintainable, provided each company is separately numbered, pays separate court fees, and publishes separate notices. The judgment clarified that separate applications are not required for each company, emphasizing the need for reports from the Central Government and Registrar for each company involved. The Court highlighted the applicability of Order I Rule 1 of the CPC to company petitions, allowing multiple plaintiffs to join in one suit. Additionally, the Court discussed the concept of per incuriam in judicial decisions and the precedential value of coordinate Bench decisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109324