<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 333 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109319</link>
    <description>Stock exchange bye-laws with statutory force may validly provide an appellate remedy alongside the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because the Act applies to such statutory arbitrations only so far as it is not inconsistent with the governing rules. A challenge directed at the appellate award was therefore not barred on the limitation objection premised on a direct section 34 attack on the original award. The award was also vulnerable because both the original and appellate awards failed to give reasons for rejecting the adjustment claim, contrary to the mandatory requirement in section 31(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 333 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109319</link>
      <description>Stock exchange bye-laws with statutory force may validly provide an appellate remedy alongside the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because the Act applies to such statutory arbitrations only so far as it is not inconsistent with the governing rules. A challenge directed at the appellate award was therefore not barred on the limitation objection premised on a direct section 34 attack on the original award. The award was also vulnerable because both the original and appellate awards failed to give reasons for rejecting the adjustment claim, contrary to the mandatory requirement in section 31(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>