<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109318</link>
    <description>The court ordered the winding up of the Company based on just and equitable grounds under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act. This decision was influenced by the disappearance of the Company&#039;s substratum, financial stringency, deadlock in management, and non-transfer of licensed capacity. The court found no alternative remedy viable and considered the Petitioner&#039;s conduct fair, appointing the Official Liquidator for the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109318</link>
      <description>The court ordered the winding up of the Company based on just and equitable grounds under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act. This decision was influenced by the disappearance of the Company&#039;s substratum, financial stringency, deadlock in management, and non-transfer of licensed capacity. The court found no alternative remedy viable and considered the Petitioner&#039;s conduct fair, appointing the Official Liquidator for the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>