https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109314 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal, setting aside the CLB's order and remanding the matter back to the CLB for fresh consideration. The CLB was directed to focus solely on whether the delay in filing satisfaction of charge was due to inadvertence or sufficient cause and to avoid assessing the merits of the charge satisfaction, which is the ROC's responsibility. The High Court also ensured that the ROC's decision would not be influenced by the CLB's previous observations. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:08:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109314 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the appeal, setting aside the CLB's order and remanding the matter back to the CLB for fresh consideration. The CLB was directed to focus solely on whether the delay in filing satisfaction of charge was due to inadvertence or sufficient cause and to avoid assessing the merits of the charge satisfaction, which is the ROC's responsibility. The High Court also ensured that the ROC's decision would not be influenced by the CLB's previous observations. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109314