<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 326 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109312</link>
    <description>An un-enforced foreign award cannot be treated as a presently due and payable debt for a winding up petition because enforceability under the arbitration statute is a precondition to binding force and execution. The award must first be taken through the statutory enforcement process, where objections can be raised and decided; until then, the company court cannot convert it into an immediately recoverable debt. Disputed issues about the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, including waiver or acquiescence, require evidence and detailed adjudication and are not fit for summary company proceedings. Those matters must be left to the proper forum in enforcement proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 326 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109312</link>
      <description>An un-enforced foreign award cannot be treated as a presently due and payable debt for a winding up petition because enforceability under the arbitration statute is a precondition to binding force and execution. The award must first be taken through the statutory enforcement process, where objections can be raised and decided; until then, the company court cannot convert it into an immediately recoverable debt. Disputed issues about the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, including waiver or acquiescence, require evidence and detailed adjudication and are not fit for summary company proceedings. Those matters must be left to the proper forum in enforcement proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>