https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109304 The court rejected objections raised by a minority shareholder regarding a scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found no evidence of mala fide intention or prejudice, upheld compliance with the Listing Agreement, validated the voting process and scrutineer appointment, and approved the valuation method for determining the swap ratio. The scheme was sanctioned, with the transferor and transferee companies directed to pay costs, and the order's operation stayed until a specified date. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:38:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109304 The court rejected objections raised by a minority shareholder regarding a scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found no evidence of mala fide intention or prejudice, upheld compliance with the Listing Agreement, validated the voting process and scrutineer appointment, and approved the valuation method for determining the swap ratio. The scheme was sanctioned, with the transferor and transferee companies directed to pay costs, and the order's operation stayed until a specified date. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109304