<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109303</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a summary remedy for wrongful obtaining and wrongful withholding of company property, including immovable property, and it extends to former employees and persons claiming through them. The provision is stated to operate despite parallel civil proceedings, because it creates a lawful procedure for recovery of company property. The text also notes that a chairman&#039;s informal assurance does not bind the company unless authorised by the board or governing instruments, and continued occupation after notice may amount to wrongful withholding. A later civil interim arrangement may affect immediate delivery of possession, but not the earlier wrongful retention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109303</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a summary remedy for wrongful obtaining and wrongful withholding of company property, including immovable property, and it extends to former employees and persons claiming through them. The provision is stated to operate despite parallel civil proceedings, because it creates a lawful procedure for recovery of company property. The text also notes that a chairman&#039;s informal assurance does not bind the company unless authorised by the board or governing instruments, and continued occupation after notice may amount to wrongful withholding. A later civil interim arrangement may affect immediate delivery of possession, but not the earlier wrongful retention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>