https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109296 Preventive detention may be sustained on a single incident if surrounding circumstances and antecedents provide material for the detaining authority's reasonable satisfaction that the detenu is likely to repeat prejudicial conduct. The quashing of a co-detenu's detention does not automatically confer parity where the earlier decision rested on a ground not accepted in the present matter and no prejudice to the detenu is shown. An unsigned and undated communication is not treated as a valid representation for Article 22(5) scrutiny, and no unexplained delay in consideration was established on the record. en-us Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109296 Preventive detention may be sustained on a single incident if surrounding circumstances and antecedents provide material for the detaining authority's reasonable satisfaction that the detenu is likely to repeat prejudicial conduct. The quashing of a co-detenu's detention does not automatically confer parity where the earlier decision rested on a ground not accepted in the present matter and no prejudice to the detenu is shown. An unsigned and undated communication is not treated as a valid representation for Article 22(5) scrutiny, and no unexplained delay in consideration was established on the record. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109296