<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109278</link>
    <description>The company petition for winding up based on non-payment of dues was dismissed by the Company Judge. The appellant had settled the matter with the respondent-company, but later raised a grievance regarding further dues. Despite receiving partial payment and not taking action for four years, the appellant demanded more payment, leading to the filing of the petition. The Company Judge dismissed the petition, stating the amount claimed was not a debt, the respondent had disputed liability, and there was no inability to pay debts. The High Court upheld this decision, finding no merit in the appeal and affirming the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109278</link>
      <description>The company petition for winding up based on non-payment of dues was dismissed by the Company Judge. The appellant had settled the matter with the respondent-company, but later raised a grievance regarding further dues. Despite receiving partial payment and not taking action for four years, the appellant demanded more payment, leading to the filing of the petition. The Company Judge dismissed the petition, stating the amount claimed was not a debt, the respondent had disputed liability, and there was no inability to pay debts. The High Court upheld this decision, finding no merit in the appeal and affirming the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>