<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109268</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the SEBI regulations were validly laid before Parliament as required by Section 31 of the Act, and there was no modification or annulment. Therefore, the regulations continued to have the force of law. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutionality of the regulations was found to be without merit. As a result, the rule was discharged, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 327 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109268</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the SEBI regulations were validly laid before Parliament as required by Section 31 of the Act, and there was no modification or annulment. Therefore, the regulations continued to have the force of law. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the constitutionality of the regulations was found to be without merit. As a result, the rule was discharged, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>