https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109267 An unincorporated association of workmen, lacking independent legal personality on the admitted facts, failed to establish locus standi to challenge the BIFR and appellate orders; the non-impleadment objection did not vitiate the quasi-judicial proceedings. In writ review under Article 226, the Court confined itself to the legality of the decision-making process, found that the revival proposal had been considered, and saw no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, arbitrariness, irrationality, or reliance on irrelevant factors. Subsequent developments in connected company proceedings did not justify moulding relief, so the writ petition was not entertained and the impugned orders were sustained. en-us Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109267 An unincorporated association of workmen, lacking independent legal personality on the admitted facts, failed to establish locus standi to challenge the BIFR and appellate orders; the non-impleadment objection did not vitiate the quasi-judicial proceedings. In writ review under Article 226, the Court confined itself to the legality of the decision-making process, found that the revival proposal had been considered, and saw no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, arbitrariness, irrationality, or reliance on irrelevant factors. Subsequent developments in connected company proceedings did not justify moulding relief, so the writ petition was not entertained and the impugned orders were sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109267