<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 382 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remand, directing the jurisdictional Commissioner to determine individual drawback caps for the exported goods. The decision favored the exporters, acknowledging their entitlement to drawback on embroidered goods subject to specified caps, emphasizing compliance with relevant regulations and circulars in customs matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 382 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remand, directing the jurisdictional Commissioner to determine individual drawback caps for the exported goods. The decision favored the exporters, acknowledging their entitlement to drawback on embroidered goods subject to specified caps, emphasizing compliance with relevant regulations and circulars in customs matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>