<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 593 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109225</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was unavailable on damaged or defective cathode ray tubes found before use because inputs qualify only when used in or in relation to manufacture; Rule 57D did not apply absent proof that they arose as waste or refuse during manufacture. Duty on parts removed for repair had to be worked out under the credit mechanism for inputs removed as such. SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. remained available because the mark &quot;HM&quot; denoted the model, not another person&#039;s brand name, and the goods were not shown to bear a foreign brand. The unresolved allegation of unaccounted clearances required fresh examination after hearing the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:12:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 593 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109225</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was unavailable on damaged or defective cathode ray tubes found before use because inputs qualify only when used in or in relation to manufacture; Rule 57D did not apply absent proof that they arose as waste or refuse during manufacture. Duty on parts removed for repair had to be worked out under the credit mechanism for inputs removed as such. SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. remained available because the mark &quot;HM&quot; denoted the model, not another person&#039;s brand name, and the goods were not shown to bear a foreign brand. The unresolved allegation of unaccounted clearances required fresh examination after hearing the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>