https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109197 Where Modvat credit on yarn had not been availed under Rule 57A and Rule 57G, the procedural bar in Rule 57F(4) did not apply to movement of goods to a job worker or to the related re-credit, subject to verification of that factual position. The text notes that the assessee's contention had merit on the material before the Tribunal, but the asserted non-availment of credit required factual confirmation before full relief could follow. The matter was therefore remitted only for limited factual verification, and relief was confined to that extent. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:47:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109197 Where Modvat credit on yarn had not been availed under Rule 57A and Rule 57G, the procedural bar in Rule 57F(4) did not apply to movement of goods to a job worker or to the related re-credit, subject to verification of that factual position. The text notes that the assessee's contention had merit on the material before the Tribunal, but the asserted non-availment of credit required factual confirmation before full relief could follow. The matter was therefore remitted only for limited factual verification, and relief was confined to that extent. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109197