<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 715 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109187</link>
    <description>In a classification dispute concerning rapid hardening cement, the product composition and prior assessments of similar goods showed a bona fide dispute on classification. Because co-ordinate authorities had taken differing views, the interim stage warranted giving the applicant the benefit of doubt, without finally deciding the classification question on merits. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 715 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109187</link>
      <description>In a classification dispute concerning rapid hardening cement, the product composition and prior assessments of similar goods showed a bona fide dispute on classification. Because co-ordinate authorities had taken differing views, the interim stage warranted giving the applicant the benefit of doubt, without finally deciding the classification question on merits. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>