<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 792 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109175</link>
    <description>Duty could not be fastened on the principal supplier for winding wire manufactured by a job worker, because the exemption notification relied upon did not cover winding wire and expressly excluded it from the relevant entry. Non-payment of duty on electric motors used in exempt pumps did not mean the assessee had availed that notification for winding wire. Since the goods were manufactured by a job worker, any primary duty liability would lie on the job worker, not the assessee. The duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 792 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109175</link>
      <description>Duty could not be fastened on the principal supplier for winding wire manufactured by a job worker, because the exemption notification relied upon did not cover winding wire and expressly excluded it from the relevant entry. Non-payment of duty on electric motors used in exempt pumps did not mean the assessee had availed that notification for winding wire. Since the goods were manufactured by a job worker, any primary duty liability would lie on the job worker, not the assessee. The duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>