<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 790 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109173</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on conveyor belts and dust collecting bags as capital goods under the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. The lower appellate authority had allowed credit by relying on earlier precedent that recognised these items as eligible under Rule 57Q, and the Tribunal noted that the eligibility issue had already been settled in favour of the assessee. The stated effect was that credit remained available on both conveyor belts and dust collecting bags, consistent with the cited decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 790 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109173</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on conveyor belts and dust collecting bags as capital goods under the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. The lower appellate authority had allowed credit by relying on earlier precedent that recognised these items as eligible under Rule 57Q, and the Tribunal noted that the eligibility issue had already been settled in favour of the assessee. The stated effect was that credit remained available on both conveyor belts and dust collecting bags, consistent with the cited decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>