<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 875 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109155</link>
    <description>Rule 57-S of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was interpreted as governing removal of moulds and dies to a job worker for manufacture on behalf of the principal manufacturer, and not as importing the broader job-worker concept used in exemption notifications such as Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision on identical facts and held that the appellant could not be required to make a pre-deposit of duty and penalty when duty had already been paid in accordance with law and the issue was covered by precedent. Pre-deposit was waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:09:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 875 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109155</link>
      <description>Rule 57-S of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was interpreted as governing removal of moulds and dies to a job worker for manufacture on behalf of the principal manufacturer, and not as importing the broader job-worker concept used in exemption notifications such as Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision on identical facts and held that the appellant could not be required to make a pre-deposit of duty and penalty when duty had already been paid in accordance with law and the issue was covered by precedent. Pre-deposit was waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>