https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109150 No prior deposit was warranted for capital goods in a 100% export oriented unit because duty had not yet been quantified and the goods remained in a bonded warehouse under Customs control; the matter was still at the assessment stage after filing of the bill of entry. The Tribunal also held that the Superintendent's letter threatening recovery of an earlier confirmed demand was erroneous and should not be acted upon, because the original adjudication had already been set aside in appeal and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving the later proceedings still pending. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109150 No prior deposit was warranted for capital goods in a 100% export oriented unit because duty had not yet been quantified and the goods remained in a bonded warehouse under Customs control; the matter was still at the assessment stage after filing of the bill of entry. The Tribunal also held that the Superintendent's letter threatening recovery of an earlier confirmed demand was erroneous and should not be acted upon, because the original adjudication had already been set aside in appeal and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving the later proceedings still pending. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109150