<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1097 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial classification of &quot;32 MS Modular Spray Pumps&quot; under tariff Heading 9616.10 for Customs purposes, agreeing with the appellants that the product should not be categorized as scent sprays. Instead, the Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration to determine whether classification under sub-heading 8413.20 or 8424 would be more suitable, based on the broader scope of spraying appliances under Heading 8424.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1097 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the initial classification of &quot;32 MS Modular Spray Pumps&quot; under tariff Heading 9616.10 for Customs purposes, agreeing with the appellants that the product should not be categorized as scent sprays. Instead, the Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration to determine whether classification under sub-heading 8413.20 or 8424 would be more suitable, based on the broader scope of spraying appliances under Heading 8424.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>