<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 824 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of 7,216 kgs of copper scrap and penalties imposed on the appellants, as the Department failed to prove the goods were smuggled. The reliance on retracted statements without corroboration was deemed insufficient, leading to the conclusion that the Department lacked adequate evidence to support the confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. Consequently, all four appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 824 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of 7,216 kgs of copper scrap and penalties imposed on the appellants, as the Department failed to prove the goods were smuggled. The reliance on retracted statements without corroboration was deemed insufficient, leading to the conclusion that the Department lacked adequate evidence to support the confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. Consequently, all four appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>