<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 311 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109110</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petitioner company&#039;s application to adjust the share premium against a permanent loss in investment, emphasizing that such adjustment must be authorized by law and the company&#039;s Articles of Association. The court held that the application did not comply with the Companies Act, 1956, and the petitioner was not entitled to the requested order, ultimately rejecting the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 311 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109110</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petitioner company&#039;s application to adjust the share premium against a permanent loss in investment, emphasizing that such adjustment must be authorized by law and the company&#039;s Articles of Association. The court held that the application did not comply with the Companies Act, 1956, and the petitioner was not entitled to the requested order, ultimately rejecting the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>