<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 625 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the duty applicable to imported leather clicking knives should consider the concessional rate applicable to the machines they were designed for under Notification 59/87, rather than solely the standard rate specified in the Customs Tariff Act. Therefore, the recovery of the higher duty amount was deemed unsustainable. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding the higher duty amount was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:24:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 625 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the duty applicable to imported leather clicking knives should consider the concessional rate applicable to the machines they were designed for under Notification 59/87, rather than solely the standard rate specified in the Customs Tariff Act. Therefore, the recovery of the higher duty amount was deemed unsustainable. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding the higher duty amount was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>