https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109096 A contractual choice-of-foreign-law and foreign-forum clause does not displace statutory jurisdiction under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, because the Act creates independent remedies that operate only under its own scheme. In unfair trade practice proceedings against a foreign entity, jurisdiction depends on whether the alleged practice was carried on in India; a mere overseas transaction or felt effect in India is not enough. The Commission had to resolve factual questions on agency, representations, passing of title, and repair obligations on evidence, so reliance on Indian effect alone was unsustainable. The matter was remitted for evidence on the second jurisdictional objection. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109096 A contractual choice-of-foreign-law and foreign-forum clause does not displace statutory jurisdiction under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, because the Act creates independent remedies that operate only under its own scheme. In unfair trade practice proceedings against a foreign entity, jurisdiction depends on whether the alleged practice was carried on in India; a mere overseas transaction or felt effect in India is not enough. The Commission had to resolve factual questions on agency, representations, passing of title, and repair obligations on evidence, so reliance on Indian effect alone was unsustainable. The matter was remitted for evidence on the second jurisdictional objection. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109096