<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 302 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109095</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition filed by a former promoter Director of the respondent company due to unpaid debts, noting a bona fide dispute over the alleged balance amount. The court found that the petition was not filed in good faith but as a threat for debt recovery, emphasizing the lack of merit in the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 302 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109095</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition filed by a former promoter Director of the respondent company due to unpaid debts, noting a bona fide dispute over the alleged balance amount. The court found that the petition was not filed in good faith but as a threat for debt recovery, emphasizing the lack of merit in the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>